SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2009
Amicus Needed Desperately
THE GULF CASE (Legal Incoherence 2009 - Part II)
Amicus Needed Desparately:
CASE #3:06-cv-00095-MCR-EMT - Appeal Case # 09-12234-C
You may have heard of Nomocracy before. Simply put, it means the rule of law which limits the discretion of officials, and provides a process by which errors or abuse of discretion can be corrected. We trust officials to exercise such discretion as they have with wisdom, justice, and competence, to avoid government that is arbitrary, insolent, discriminatory, prejudiced, intrusive and corrupt. However, can judges push the envelope sometimes?
It was President Jimmy Carter who once said,
"The best way to enhance freedom in other lands is to demonstrate here that our democratic system is worthy of emulation." -Jimmy Carter |
As stated in the previous post, the GULF CASE is not fiction but it is about first and foremost the violation of property rights against an African american family and against Property rights policies upheld by the Supreme Courts and the Justice Department. It is the true story of an African-American family and their total demise on American soil due to injustice in 2009. After approximately 25 years of successful development and wonderful achievements, as a former Department of Defense Contractor, an African-American real estate developer was ravaged and devastated by a lower Government namely the walton County on the Gulf of Mexico and the plaintiffs' case was worsened by a deadly blow from a Federal Judge who after 379 motions and attorney entries, three years of debate, an array of depositions, and a plethora of lies, deceits, misleadings, inconsistencies and falsehood, issued an incoherent order to make bad matter worse. Unchecked properly by superiors, the judge has done the unthinkable against what she stated before she would never do meaning to make the public afraid of the court. This saga entails romance, intrigues, dangers and the eventual demise of an African-American family who watched their American Dream turn to an American nightmare on American soil, after following the rules and working their tail off for approximately 25 years. Would you call this a judicial oversight, judicial discretion or plain injustice? Speak loud America and respond lest this becomes the norm under this historic administration which does not stand for injustice. We will analyze one of these incoherences among many in this blog.
INCOHERENCE # 2: On February 6, 2007 the same judge issued an apology to the plaintiffs stating that the court committed oversight because the court assumed that the matter was addressed properly. On March 31, 2009, the same judge accused the plaintiffs' attorney of wasting the court's scarce judicial resources. This may be well beyond incoherence to the point of contradiction or else. Who wasted the time? Evidently, it was the court. Would you call this an judicial oversight, judicial discretion or plain injustice?
This African American family needs an amicus desperately as their case stands in appellate court right now. Any Friend of the court can issue that Amicus to let the court know that other eyes are scrutinizing the unfolding of this case closely. You may contact Sony Roy at (240) 786-8637 or email him at mybafu@gmail.com. Any bipartisan efforts ill be greatly appreciated.
Please leave us your comments or your support below.
This is a bog by BAFU USA standing for Bounce Back America From Unemployment. For more information about theBAFU Presidential Registry click here.
For information about BAFU's diligent work on behalf of the unemployed, click here.
